9/11 Coincidences (12/19) | 11Out2011 16:38:19
In the 100+ years of steel framed buildings, only 3 have ever collapsed due to fire.
All 3 were leased by the same man
All 3 fell in exactly the same way
and all on the same day.
Firefighters, police officers, reporters and many other eyewitnesses all reported explosives going off inside the buildings. Yet none of this is mentioned in the mainstream media.
The Pentagon is the most guarded building on earth. There are more CCTV cameras covering this building than any other building on the planet. Yet the government won’t release any videos showing a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon on 9/11.
In Sept. 2000, a right-wing think-tank drafted a document called: “Project for the New American Century” (PNAC). It states that if we are going to transform America into “tomorrow’s dominant force”, it is going to be a long process... unless there is a “catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”
On the morning of 9/11, NORAD was in day two of a week long terrorist drill exercise called “Vigilant Guardian”. This exercise was a simulation of a real terrorist attack on the WTC, involving hijacked airliners.
First time in US history that a President or vice-president was in direct control of the military agency. NORAD was founded in 1957 and generals always had the power to shoot down or intercept hijacked aircraft. But on June 1st, 2001 . . . Then senior FAA officials ordered air-traffic control to shred the tapes from 911, in violation of Federal Law. When AP learned of the drills
The official story says that WTC7 collapsed as a result of fire.
Yet the building’s collapse had all the hallmarks of a controlled demolition. The leaseholder of the building even admitted that he gave the order to “pull” the building down.
Silverstein, a commercial real-estate tycoon with international political connections acquired a 99 year lease on the . . . complex in the Spring of 2001. Throughout the Summer he re-worked the insurance policies on his new properties, making sure that it was covered for acts of terrorism. Explicit in the lease agreement was Silverstein right to rebuild the complex if it were destroyed. After 911 Mr. Silverstein brought his insurers in court to obtain double his policy limit for the destruction of his property, maintaining that the double hijacking constituted two disasters caused by terrorists, not just one. He won, and was awarded 7 billion dollars, a magnificent return on his original 15 [????] million dollar investment.
. . . also, in 6,5 seconds, lost for ever were thousands of FCC case files on corporate fraud including those relating to the notorious activities of giants world.com and Enrom, a few indictments for stock fraud but what of the 70 billion dollar California Electricity Swindle?
Fact: uncontrolled jet-fuel fires CANNOT liquidize steel.
Who was the director . . . that provided electronic security for the WTC and Washington Dulles Airport, both involved in 911? None other than the president’s younger brother.
5 or 6 of the 19 hijackers were alive after the incident
Osama bin Laden: 5 days after the attacks BL stated that he had no knowledge of the attacks
--->) Larry Silverstein
--->) PNAC manifesto; 12 months later 911 happens
--->) Dick Cheney
--->) The arms industry; The Carlyle Group
--->) Oil companies
Taliban refused to construct the pipeline
--->) US government, NWO; . . . allows arrest on suspicion, without a warrant, without probable cause, in secret, without notifying anybody, without the right to see a lawyer.
With Barrie Zwicker
--->) George Bush: “I was sitting outside the classroom, waiting to go in and I saw an airplane hit the tower, the TV was obviously on”
--->) “They did it in a controlled fashion” – Senator John Kerry, speaking in Austin, Texas, 22 April 2007
--->) Investigate the events
Appoint Investigative commissioners
6 days after the sinking of the Titanic, chairman is appointed to head investigation
9 days after Pearl Harbour
7 days after Kennedy’s assassination
7 days after Challenger’s Disaster
How many days after 9/11 is it that President Bush names someone to head an investigation? 411 Call it foot-dragging. The White House chooses all the commissioner . . . . sums it up: “The White House did everything in its power to derail an open inquiry. Then, when faced with its inevitability, the president and his aides sought to limit its scope, its access and its funding. This commission was about as independent from the White House control and manipulation as the abused prisoners at Abu Graib were from their jailers.
Mandate: the commission itself says “We’re not out to blame anyone; in other words, accountability is not part of the mandate.
Budget? In January 2003 the Bush administration allots the Commission 3 million dollars. This compares to 5 million to a 1996 commission that looked into casino gambling and 50 million each for the inquiries into Columbia shuttle Explosion and the Clinton’s failed Whitewater deal. The dollar amount is later grudgingly raised but never exceeds 15 million.
The White House releases only 25% of 11.000 documents requested. It blacks out portions of the released documents, resists requests that the administration officials testify under oath and tries to rush the commission deadline. After a cat and mouse game, Bush and Cheney meet the commission. But it’s behind closed doors, they refuse to testify under oath, no tape recorders are allowed, no transcript is allowed, Bush makes no opening statement and those taking notes must submit them to security personnel.
All of this is what is called in law “guilty demeanor”. The behavior of the White House in relation to the Commission, from start to finish, only makes sense if the official story is a lie and the truth needs to be kept secret.
The Bush-Laden Connection
The Bush-Laden Connection (cont.)
When the stocks hit bottom on 9/12 somebody made a fortune.
So who had the foreknowledge to take full advantage of that ‘opportunity’?
Profits by insider trailers: 50 B dollars.
Phil Erlanger: What I see is prior knowledge; you can call it conspiracy, it’s my opinion that somebody knew ahead of time that 911 was going to happen and made his bets to take advantage of it.
On average, during the 1st week of September, 2001, 27 put options were bought each day on Morgan Stanley, one of the WTC largest occupants. The total for the put options for the 3 days prior to the attacks was 2,157. Merrill Lynch, also in the WTC, saw (?) 12.215 put stock options. That is 12 times its normal level. Between Sep. 6 and 7 Chicago Board Options Exchange saw 4,744 put options vs. 396 call options. On Sep. 10th put options for American Airline totaled 4,516 vs. 748 call options. In addition these trades were not only occurring in our country but around the world. There is no chance that all or even most of the trades, were placed by Osama bin Laden or Al-Qaeda. According to Fox News, CNN and the BBC, insider trading reports were found in the USA, Germany, Britain, France, Canada, Japan, MonteCarlo, Switzerland, Hong-Kong, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Luxembourg and Singapore. The Director of the CIA headed a firm that bought some of these put stock options; until 1998 . . .
Ernst Welteke, Bundesbank President: There are ever clear signs that there were activities on international financial markets that must have been carried out with the necessary expert knowledge in industries such as gold, oil, airlines and insurance companies.
There was a lot o money to be made from the events o Sep 11 and it did. Many people in our own government called the events of 911 “an opportunity”.
The firm used to place the put options on United Airlines stock was managed until 1998 by the man who is now the number 3 Executive Director position at the CIA, A. B. Buzzy Krongard became vice-chairman of Bankers Trust when the two firms merged . . .
- - - - - -
How could someone have placed anonymous put options on American Airlines and United Airlines just prior to the attacks of 9/11? Then ask yourself why no one has investigated this suspicious deal. Ask yourself why there has been no attempt by the US government to identify the person who anticipated huge profits from a disaster that was yet to occur. Is it because the trail possibly leads to the CIA?
Krongard was in the news in Nov 2007. Alvin's brother is Howard "Cookie" Krongard, who Bush appointed to the position State Department Inspector General. Howard was questioned by Congress for interfering with the investigation of Blackwater. Howard vehmently denied that Buzzy is on the board of Blackwater, then reversed himself minutes later, after being confronted with incriminating documentation by Rep. Cummings from Maryland.
Howard was caught lying, but he wriggled out.
Alvin "Buzzy" Krongard was picked from Wall Street and installed at the CIA in March 2001, when George Tenet created a position for him, of "Executive Director". Prior to CIA, Krongard worked for a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank/Bankers Trust (?), a bank that was aligned with Hitler and the Holocaust. Therefore, Deutsche Bank was also aligned with U.S. Intelligence, with the OSS, with CIA precursors, Dulles bros, during World War 2. These were people who helped the Nazis rise to power, and helped key Nazis escape justice. Mike Ruppert pointed out that massive and unprecedented short sales of stocks (put options) were placed on United and American on Sept 9 and Sept 10 (and on Merrill-Lynch), by unknown individuals, for no visible financial indicators, other than foreknowledge of the attacks, obviously down to details of which airlines would be used. Neither Congress nor the Executive were willing to investigate who placed those bets, even though they have real-time computer monitoring of stock trades.
from Wikipedia: In a 14-page letter on September 18, 2007, House Oversight Committee chairman Henry Waxman charged Krongard with actively impeding probes into waste and corruption related to the Iraq War and other matters. Aides to Krongard threatened two U.S. State Department investigators with retaliation, including termination of their jobs, if they cooperated with the investigations into Blackwater USA and Krongard, according to a report released by the U.S. House of Representatives. Krongard directly interfered with federal prosecutors when they asked his office for help with investigating possible Blackwater
- - - - -
September 6, 2001 - Some of the put options placed on United Airlines stock were purchased through the investment banking firm of Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown in which the current Executive Director of the CIA, A.B. "Buzzy" Krongard, used to be the company's CEO up until 1998.
"Investors have yet to collect more than $2.5 million in profits they made trading options in the stock of United Airlines before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, according to a source familiar with the trades and market data.
The source familiar with the United trades identified Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown, the American investment banking arm of German giant Deutsche Bank, as the investment bank used to purchase at least some of the options. Rohini Pragasam, a bank spokeswoman, declined comment." - San Francisco Chronicle (09/29/01)
"Share speculators have failed to collect $2.5m (£1.7m) in profits made from the fall in the share price of United Airlines after the 11 September World Trade Centre attacks. The fact that the money is unclaimed more than a month later has re-awakened investigators' interest in a story dismissed as coincidence.
It may be that investors who were able to predict the share price crash so skillfully are reluctant to be seen profiting from tragedy. But investigators now wonder whether there is a more sinister explanation.
To the embarrassment of investigators, it has also emerged that the firm used to buy many of the "put" options – where a trader, in effect, bets on a share price fall – on United Airlines stock was headed until 1998 by "Buzzy" Krongard, now executive director of the CIA.
Until 1997, Mr Krongard was chairman of Alex Brown Inc, America's oldest investment banking firm. Alex Brown was acquired by Bankers Trust, which in turn was bought by Deutsche Bank. His last post before resigning to take his senior role in the CIA was to head Bankers Trust – Alex Brown's private client business, dealing with the accounts and investments of wealthy customers around the world.
There is no suggestion that Mr Krongard had advance knowledge of the attacks.
It was not just airlines that were targeted by remarkably canny investors. One of the biggest occupants of the World Trade Centre was Morgan Stanley, the investment bank. In the first week of September, an average of 27 put option contracts was bought each day in its shares. The total for the three days before the attacks was 2,157. Merrill Lynch, another WTC tenant, saw 12,215 put options bought in the four days before the attacks, when the previous days had seen averages of 252 contracts a day."
Something wasn’t right that day - John Schroeder FDNY fighfighter
False flag operations